‘An Anton Piller Order should appoint an independent supervising solicitor (ISS) who is independent of the Plaintiff or its solicitors and is to be present at the search to ensure its integrity.’
—Celanese Canada Inc. ats Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] SCR 189, para 40
‘The Anton Piller Order bears an uncomfortable resemblance to a private search warrant. The protections to those subject to such an order are threefold:
- a carefully drawn order setting out the safeguards to those subject to the Order;
- a vigilant court appointed supervising solicitor who is independent of the parties;
- a sense of responsible self-restraint on those executing the Order.’
—Celanese Canada Inc. ats Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] SCR 189, para 1
‘Solicitors who accept the responsibility for supervising the execution of search and listing orders must do so with appropriate sensitivity for the defendant’s rights. In the enforcement of the order, plaintiffs must act with due circumspection. As the issuance of Anton Piller Orders becomes more frequent, there is a tendency to forget how serious of an intervention they are in the privacy and rights of the defendants. Reasonable counsel understand the need to respect privacy and the rules of the adversary system of dispute resolution. The execution of Anton Piller Orders is important to the administration of justice. The Court expects the ISS acting as an officer of the Court to exercise independent judgment, prudence, and respect for the defendants’ rights.’
—Grenzservice Speditions Ges.m.b.H ats Jans, [1995] B.C.J. No. 2481 BCSC